De Pronuntionis Sapientiae | Pronouncement of Knowledge

I. This Pronouncement

i. By Right, Power and Authority of the Sovereign Rights as Pronounced by Our Prounouncement De Unitas Canada as a Free Sovereign of the Free Society of United Canada we make these further pronouncements known collectively as De Pronuntionis Sapientiae and also known as the Pronouncement of Knowledge; and

ii. These Sovereign Rights may be taken in official original document form and spoken form to represent one complete set of Rights and the highest of all Original Sovereign Law with the other Pronouncements we make; and

iii. When referring to Our Sovereign Pronouncements collectively is may also be taken both in printed form and spoken word that we mean the complete and accurate set of Rights as the highest of all Original Sovereign Law.

II. The Use of Rights Pronounced as Original Law

i. By Our Right, Our Hand and our Voice we solemnly pledge our most sacred sovereign act to use these Pronouncements and all Our Sovereign Rights for the betterment of our neighbour, our community respecting at all times due process and the living law; and

ii. Whilst Our Rights may permit the strongest of remedy against an injury inflicted upon Us and to the body of the Living Law, our goal shall be at all times to present fair and proportional remedy, not to exceed fair remedy and to seek positive solutions for the benefit of all parties; and

iii. We shall at all times remain respectful to the Office and Obligations of Sovereign and shall demonstrate respect for and kindness for others, as we may seek respect to be shown to Us, even when such respect is not demonstrated to Us.

III. Rules, Objects and Existence

i. All systems of Knowledge depend upon the same basic elements for their function and validation- the simplest model being described as a system of rules and objects; and

ii.All existence depends upon the simultaneous existence of rules and objects. A word has no meaning if the thing which it seeks to define has no existence. Similarly a group of words have no value unless rules exist by which these same words may be arranged to describe relationships between things and associted meaning; and

iii.Objects cannot exist independently in reality without rules. Conversely, rules cannot exist in reality without objects (matter). The only thing that can exist in theory is rules; and

iv.The only system that exists demonstrating an origin of theoretical rules as well as rules and objects operating in reality is a dream; and

v.Therefore no system, no matter of old, how complex can claim absolute truth, only superior remedy. However, when an alternative knowledge system is presented of superior architecture, the inferior system has no right of claim to continue except to retreat to claims of custom and tradition (orthodoxy).

IV. Words, meaning and system

i. Words are unique groupings of symbols that represent some concept (meaning or thing) which may also be pronounced using the same symbols to represent sound constructs, or by some alternate method; and

ii. The meaning or thing associated with a word has an independent existence. Therefore more than one word may exist that describes the exact same concept; and

iii. All words have provenance-- that it all words have a date of birth, a place of birth, and author (or authors) and an original meaning; and

iv. Word may be generally created in two ways, the first being in reponse to a new invention, inventor, and/or event and secondly as part of a greater model in which more than one new word is created; and

v. While a word may have one or more common meanings, when the word was historically created as part of a greater model, its original meaning and its context as part of the original model takes precedence; and

vi. The strength of a word never rests with its age. Instead, the strength of a word rests, not in what it describes but principally upon the strength of the model in which it was originally formed and how useful the word is in relation to the other words of the model. Therefore, a vastly superior model will always have greater strength and superiority to an incomplete and flawed moded of words, no matter how old the words; and

vii. As the etymology and provenance of words may be deliberately corrupted and misrepresented, only when the original motive, original system and original context of a word may be demonstrated that a meaning may be reliably concluded as valid, regardless of how many claimed citations of its use may exist; and

viii. Citations of themselves never reveal the authenticity of original meaning of a word, only its claimed usage.

V. Data, Information and Knowledge

i.Data, information and knowledge possess discrete definitions in themselves and cannot be used as interchangeable terms. Data is defined as raw electronic material “as is” and not yet unclassified by any discrete enterprise or industry classification system; and

ii.Information is defined as Data that has been classified and stored by an enterprise and/or industry classification so that it can be viewed and seen by its original attributes as well as the classification system.; and

iii.Knowledge is defined as Information with its true representation of its real-world relationships that have been stored within some electronic or print system; and

iv.Digital knowledge is the sum of all electronic information stored on any magnetic, optical or other media on all computers of a nation, or body corporate. This digital knowledge represents the single digital knowledge set of the nation or body corporate and the digital intelligence of the nation or body corporate.

VI. Limits and data items

i. In contrast to their use, there is a limit to the number and definition of discrete electronic data items used by individuals and organisations. Given enough time, it is possible to map these discrete electronic data items; and

ii.In contrast to its use, once mapped, a data item can be said to have a constancy of purpose for its lifetime. For example, once defined, a data item storing the surname of a man or woman will always hold the surname of a man or woman.

iii.In contrast to its use, once mapped, there is a limit to the types of relationships between information. For example, a person object, representing a discrete set of information has a limited set of relationship types to other people. This is contrast to a potentially unlimited number of relationships.

VII. Preservation of data, information and knowledge

i. Once information or knowledge is created it must never destroyed. Once any law exists for the limited destruction of knowledge, then all knowledge, all texts, all history is liable for manipulation and corruption to some degree; and

ii.Knowledge and information, no matter what content is transmitted has some degree of merit and right to be preserved. The basis of moral, ethical and social difference should never be the basis of instigating censorship of destruction of works. Works that contravene social and legal statutes of member states can always be regulated through their publishing and sale restrictions; and

iii.Information and knowledge should never ultimately be censored to individuals who have legitimate reason to request to do so. In a general sense, it should be a primary goal of all societies to promote the widest possible education of their members in regards to alternative beliefs, sciences and ideas.

VIII. General Principles of knowledge systems

i. Knowledge used across a system can have only one primary database source. That is a database that represents the one and true accurate account of that knowledge. All other database sources are then providers and consumers to the primary database source; and

ii.The speed and performance of a knowledge system is inversely proportional to the layers of code between the source data and the user interface by the number of active users. The greater the number of lines of code in an application between the database and a users screen, the slower the performance of the application; and

iii.The cost of technology transactions equals the cube of the number of software and transaction layers between the end user and the core data they seek; and

iv.The greater the mapping of information and relationships by an application, the more universal its potential usages.

IX. Unique Indexes and Knowledge systems

i.The quality of a knowledge system is dependent upon the quality and density of unique indexes. A unique index is a unique identifier for which no other data or information has similar identity. In contrast, duplicate identities are when two or more information pieces have the same or no contrasting identification; and

ii.A lack of quality indexing is the primary cause of duplicate and error data which contributes to the wastage of economic activity and wealth of the society by increasing the basic cost of transactions; and

iii. For any large scale knowledge system to function properly, it must be founded on unique indexes capable of providing a level of surety and integrity.

X. Single Knowledge Architecture

i.Any society may be described in terms of a single knowledge architecture; and

ii.A single knowledge architecture is a system of naming and conventions for the classification and efficient relationship mapping of all data; and

iii.A digital knowledge architecture provides a complete model for the unique naming of all electronic data, types of data, associations of data that relate to daily operation of the nation; and

iv.A digital knowledge architecture enables the elimination of duplicate and erroneous data throughout the nation. It also provides a solid foundation for the delivery of low cost government and private sector services as well as competitive international trade.

XI. Knowledge System as a societies most valuable asset

i.Beyond its members a societies knowledge system is its most important asset; and

ii.It is the structure and quality of electronic knowledge of a society that represents an asset, not the software used. In the future, the costs associated with software will eventually cease to be valued as an asset; and

iii.A society might have great natural resources but limited knowledge systems and so may be limited in the quality of life for its members. But a society rich with knowledge is a society that has the capacity to extend and improve the quality of life for its members and the world; and

iv.Therefore, it must be a goal for any society that it defines, develops and protects its knowledge systems as assets of supreme value.

XII. One unique classification system of knowledge

i.In recognition of the importance of knowledge standards and knowledge architectures, a society should seek to adopt a single unique knowledge architecture for the creation, transmission and use of all forms of knowledge; and

ii.Where superior international digital knowledge standards exist for the identification of goods/services, industry and general trade, a society should ensure the standards are fully integrated into the societies digital knowledge architectures; and

iii. That the society has 1 category system for all information, functions, descriptions. The same category system is used for classifying objects in accounts as well as ordering systems.

Upon this Pronouncement we recognize the inmmutable fact that Our Sovereign Right is derived from the demonstrated proof of our Divine Creator in Unique Collective Awareness (UCA) that we are both one and unique, whilst being part of the many, the collective of all Awareness. In so being, We have full right to Claim both the authority and powers bestowed by the Divine Creator; and

Upon this Prounouncement we recognize a further immutable fact that if any sovereign man or woman, living or deceased is not free, then We cannot rightly proclaim our Own freedom; and

Therefore upon this Pronouncement, warranted by Our Sovereign Right, upon necessity, We invoke both our freedom and these Rights for Ourselves and for and on behalf of all men and women, living or deceased, with the considerate judgment of all sovereign men and women living and deceased and the gracious favor of our common Divine Creator; and

I affirm all the above supreme law, AB INITIO (FROM THE BEGINNING),

On behalf of myself and other members who are associated with me by my hand and seal this day, [NO DATE REQUIRED]

In the truth ...

_____________________________________ (right thumb print in red ink)
[your name in lower case e.g. john harry or clan doe (autographed) in red ink]
De Jure Soli Sanguinis Coronae (Concerning the law of the Blood of Crowns/Sovereigns)